✖
The People's Emergency Briefing: Positives, serious flaws and corrections needed
The People's Emergency Briefing is a film that was launched on 7 April 2026.
The film starts well, making many good points about the seriousness of the climate emergency, but it is badly let down by its closing section which merely endorses the UK Net Zero 2050 Strategy, ignoring
(a) that the Strategy's target speed of cuts in CO2 emission is far too slow
(b) that the Strategy does not even contain sufficient policies that will deliver the target cuts.
The project is also badly let down by the suggested action of asking the UK Government to give a televised emergency briefing, ignoring
(a) the Government's record of persistent misinformation in claiming that its Net Zero 2050 Strategy is adequate
(b) the failure of a previous similar campaign (for a briefing of MPs) to make a significant impact.
The film promotes the dangerous misinformation that Net Zero 2050 is an adequate policy. The organisers of the film should correct the errors and then relaunch the film; the film should not be promoted until they have done so.
Rather than trusting the UK Government to give an accurate account in a national briefing, concerned citizens should advocate genuine emergency action and support the Tyndall Centre climate scientists who have rejected the Government's Net Zero 2050 strategy as grossly inadequate and carbon colonialism, and advocated a fundamental rethink of UK climate policy based on scientific rigour and international justice.
The People's Emergency Briefing project is sadly yet another example of climate campaigning falling far short of the high standards that are needed to deal with the climate emergency. Persistent campaigning failures are delaying effective action. This should be helped by people agreeing and adhering to a Code of Practice for policy making.
The film starts well, making many good points about the seriousness of the climate emergency, but it is badly let down by its closing section which merely endorses the UK Net Zero 2050 Strategy, ignoring
(a) that the Strategy's target speed of cuts in CO2 emission is far too slow
(b) that the Strategy does not even contain sufficient policies that will deliver the target cuts.
The project is also badly let down by the suggested action of asking the UK Government to give a televised emergency briefing, ignoring
(a) the Government's record of persistent misinformation in claiming that its Net Zero 2050 Strategy is adequate
(b) the failure of a previous similar campaign (for a briefing of MPs) to make a significant impact.
The film promotes the dangerous misinformation that Net Zero 2050 is an adequate policy. The organisers of the film should correct the errors and then relaunch the film; the film should not be promoted until they have done so.
Rather than trusting the UK Government to give an accurate account in a national briefing, concerned citizens should advocate genuine emergency action and support the Tyndall Centre climate scientists who have rejected the Government's Net Zero 2050 strategy as grossly inadequate and carbon colonialism, and advocated a fundamental rethink of UK climate policy based on scientific rigour and international justice.
The People's Emergency Briefing project is sadly yet another example of climate campaigning falling far short of the high standards that are needed to deal with the climate emergency. Persistent campaigning failures are delaying effective action. This should be helped by people agreeing and adhering to a Code of Practice for policy making.
The People's Emergency Briefing - the film
The People's Emergency Briefing is a film that was launched on 7 April 2026.The organisers of the film had previously organised the National Emergency Briefing (NEB), an event held in Westminster Central Hall, London on 27 November 2025, where a set of climate and nature talks was given to an invited audience of over 1,200 including politicians.
See Document 198: National Emergency Briefing: Positives, serious flaws and corrections needed.
The organisers say the film will convey the key messages from the National Emergency Briefing.
Following on from the film, the organisers are advocating that the UK government gives a national emergency TV briefing.
Key points on the climate emergency
Some of the key points in the NEB science presentations were as follows. Key points on the climate science
according to the National Emergency Briefing scientists
Decision making
An emergency situation
Curent action is inadequate
Radical change is needed
according to the National Emergency Briefing scientists
- Decision makers must listen to the science
- There is much misinfomation
- Nothing can be changed until it is faced (quoting James Baldwin)
- "We have to be straight with people about the choices ahead"
- The situation is now extremely serious and extremely urgent
- At current emissions, the planet will reach 1.5°C of global warming around 2030
- Total global emissions are still rising
- Nature is not a luxury - it is critical infrastructure
- The UK's food supply is at risk
- There is a risk of Government systems and institutions being overwhelmed
- Globally, billions of lives are at risk
- Climate action has been grossly inadequate
- The UK's Net Zero 2050 timescale of emission cuts is not what the UK promised in the Paris Agreement - it would take 3 times the UK's fair share of the 1.5°C carbon budget
- Current affluent, high-carbon lifestyles are unsustainable - and will end one way or another, either voluntarily or by a deteriorating climate with societal collapse
- Every fraction of a degree matters because the risks of catastrophic tipping points steadily increase.
- "We need transformational change now if we're going to survive"
See Document 198: National Emergency Briefing: Positives, serious flaws and corrections needed.
Action needed on the climate emergency
Action needed to meet the UK's temperature and other commitments is as follows, according to the NEB scientists. UK policies that are aligned with climate science
according to the National Emergency Briefing scientists
according to the National Emergency Briefing scientists
- Transformational change starting immediately
- Fossil fuel use ended by 2030 - 2035
- Air travel cut by over 80% by 2030
- Manufacture of internal combustion engine cars ended immediately
- Most car journeys in urban areas replaced by public transport / walking / cycling
- Mass retrofitting of proper insulation for homes - and new homes to be zero carbon
- A diet with far less meat and dairy products
- A rapid shift to zero carbon electricity
- Adding up to profound changes in social norms and in the lifestyles of the well-off
- All justified by a recognition that current affluent, high-carbon lifestyles are unsustainable - and will end one way or another, either voluntarily or by a deteriorating climate with societal collapse.
This is very different to what is generally discussed, but, as one of the speakers pointed out, it's only simple maths.
However, two of the NEB speakers (speaking on economics and energy) ignored the science and talked only about gradual transition, adding to the general denial of the urgency of action.
See Document 198: National Emergency Briefing: Positives, serious flaws and corrections needed.
Serious flaws in the People's Emergency Briefing project
There are positives in the project - there were some excellent talks from the NEB scientists setting out the dangers of the climate emergency.But there are also some serious flaws in the project that will limit the initiative's effectiveness, if not corrected.
- Some messaging not consistent with the science: The speakers at the National Emergency Briefing who gave talks on the science explained the need for urgent radical emission reductions, but the later economics and energy speakers ignored the science and talked only about gradual transition. This glaring inconsistency has not yet been corrected. See Document 198: National Emergency Briefing: Positives, serious flaws and corrections needed.
- Promotion of misinformation: This means that the urgency of the changes needed is not well conveyed.
- Weak action advocated: Following on from the film, the main action advocated by the organisers is that the UK government gives a national emergency TV briefing. This does not make sense given that
- a major impediment to effective climate action is the UK Government's policy of Net Zero 2050, which is far too slow - so expecting the Government to give a briefing in line with the science is ludicrous
- the outcome of the previous similar initiative where Government scientists gave an online briefing to MPs was that they merely repeated the Government's Net Zero 2050 misinformation - see Document 190: Climate science briefing for MPs by Patrick Vallence and others was seriously misleading.
Corrections needed
The NEB talks advocating gradual transition need to be replaced by information on urgent radical change.The film promotes the dangerous misinformation that Net Zero 2050 is an adequate policy. The organisers of the film should correct the errors and then relaunch the film; the film should not be promoted until they have done so.
Instead of calling for a national briefing by the Government, action in line with the science is to support the Tyndall Centre climate scientists who are rejecting the UK's Net Zero 2050 strategy as grossly inadequate and carbon colonialism, and advocating a fundamental rethink of UK climate policy based on scientific rigour and international justice [1].
Notes and sources
| [1] | Kevin Anderson, Chris Jones and Gaurav Gharde (2025) The UK’s year of climate U-turns exposes a deeper failure https://theconversation.com/the-uks-year-of-climate-u-turns-exposes-a-deeper-failure-254499 |
Started: 29 Mar 2026